Call 413.540.1234 to
schedule an appointment
CONCERN/EAP: 413.534.2625
CRISIS: 413.733.6661

Health Policy & Advocacy
Resources
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
AHA Hands-Only CPR Training Kiosks Available at More Airports$100 Sweetens the Pot for a ColonoscopyJust a Few Vaccine Refusers Could Endanger ManyASCO Addresses Cancer Drug PricingHigh Court Rules Against Interstate Medical LiabilityFewer U.S. Dollars Spent on Cardiac Arrest Research: StudyPainkiller Prescriptions More Prone to Errors If HandwrittenFDA Panel OKs What May Soon Be First Gene Therapy Approved in U.S.Walking Rates Are Key to a Country's Obesity LevelsDocs Should Counsel Even Healthy People on Diet, Exercise, Experts SayHealth Service Use Unchanged From 1996-1997 to 2011-2012Easier Colon Exam Boosts Screening, But Insurers May Not PayMore U.S. Patients Are Recording Their Doctor VisitsMedication Mistakes Have Doubled in U.S. Since 2000: StudyPatient Involvement Can Cut Errors in X-Ray ImagingMarket Competition Linked to Change in Generic Drug PricesBlood Shortage Prompts Call for DonationsBullying Takes Financial Toll on U.S. School DistrictsPoll Finds Seniors Struggling With Drug Costs Don't Seek HelpMany U.S. Teens Still Denied 'Morning After' Pill at PharmaciesOlder Americans Struggling With Drug Costs Don't Ask for HelpDoctors Urged to Take Care With Electronic CommunicationsClimate Change Likely to Widen Gap Between Rich, Poor in U.S.: StudyFDA Seeks to Increase Number of Generic Drugs on Market3 Simple Steps Might Reduce Opioid OD DeathsPhysician Attitude Important Factor in Patients Switching PCPMany Adverse Events Related to Cosmetics Go UnreportedStudy Highlights the Beauty Industry's Ugly SideMedicaid Cuts Tied to Delayed Breast Cancer DiagnosesPrimary Care Pharmacy Model Attractive to Patients1991-2014 Saw Minimal Change in Health Spending Per StateLegalized Pot May Lead to More Traffic CrashesMany Doctors Silent on Cost of Cancer CareGroup Urges Tougher Limits on Chemical in Shampoos, Cosmetics18 Percent Increase Projected in Primary Care Demand by 2023Why Patients Leave the Hospital Against Doctor's OrdersRaise the Smoking Age to 21? Most Kids Fine With ThatComprehensive Audiologic Care Feasible in Free Clinic ModelMany Tanning Salons Defy Legal Age Limits on UsersLifesaving Drugs From Pfizer in Short Supply: FDALeading U.S. Doctors' Group Takes Aim at Rising Drug PricesU.S. Hospitals Still Prescribe Too Many Antibiotics: StudyFDA Puts Brakes on Rule Requiring New 'Nutrition Facts' LabelCardiac Arrest? Someday, Drones May Come to Your RescueSAMHSA: 9.8 Million U.S. Adults Have Serious Mental IllnessFDA Asks Maker of Opioid Painkiller Opana ER to Pull Drug From MarketHealth System Sees Success With E-Visits Via Patient PortalOvercharging Common in U.S. Emergency RoomsAdvocating for a Loved OneHigh Costs for Myeloma Patients Not Getting Low-Income Subsidy
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

FDA Puts Brakes on Rule Requiring New 'Nutrition Facts' Label

HealthDay News
by -- E.J. Mundell
Updated: Jun 13th 2017

new article illustration

TUESDAY, June 13, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday announced that the launch of an updated "nutrition facts" panel on foods, developed during the Obama administration, will now be delayed.

The deadline for which the food industry must comply with the new labeling will be pushed back for an undisclosed time, the Associated Press reported.

The new nutrition panel was designed to make it easier for consumers to see how many calories and added sugars a product contained.

Specifically, the revamped label would make information on calorie counts more prominent, make serving sizes easier to understand, and point to the amount of added sugars a food or drink contains. Current labels only cite amounts of total sugar in a product, which might include naturally occurring sugars, the AP said.

The original FDA deadline for compliance was July 26, 2018.

In a letter sent earlier this year to Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price, the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) and other food industry groups had asked for an extension to 2021, the AP noted.

Nutrition experts were disappointed at Tuesday's announcement.

"The nutrition facts panel needs to be easier to understand so that consumers can make more informed food decisions," said Arlene Stein.

"If some food labels change and others do not, it will make it more difficult for consumers to compare foods and make a healthier choice," said Stein, who's a nutrition support dietitian at NYU Winthrop Hospital in Mineola, N.Y. "With the prevalence of obesity increasing, these changes would be better made sooner rather than later."

Stephanie Schiff, a registered dietitian at Huntington Hospital in Huntington, N.Y., agreed. She called the delay "surprising and disheartening."

"The new nutrition label would allow consumers to have a better and clearer idea of the amounts of certain nutrients in their foods, as well as of ingredients they might choose to reduce or avoid, such as added sugars," Schiff said.

"The new label would list the amount of potassium in food," she noted. "That information would be very beneficial to people who wanted to boost their potassium intake for heart health, or who wanted to reduce potassium intake due to kidney issues, or medication interactions -- information that was not on the old label."

But the grocers association applauded the postponement. In a statement, the group said that food and beverage companies want to help consumers make informed choices, but that the "fast-approaching compliance deadline" was tough to meet without further guidance from the FDA.

This isn't the first time the Trump administration's FDA has slowed the introduction of Obama-era food industry rules. According to the AP, the agency recently delayed legislation forcing restaurants, grocery and convenience stores to post calorie counts for foods they sold until 2018.

More information

There's guidance on using the current Nutrition Facts panel at the FDA .