Call 413.540.1234 to
schedule an appointment
CONCERN/EAP: 413.534.2625
Billing questions? Call: 413.540.1212
CRISIS: 413.733.6661

Health Policy & Advocacy
Resources
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
When DEA Cracked Down on Opioids, Abusers Moved to Black Market: StudyStigma of Safe Needle Exchanges Lingers Despite Opioid EpidemicAHA: Drones a Lifesaver for Cardiac Arrest Patients?Millions Die Worldwide Each Year for Lack of Quality CareTips for Handling a Medical EmergencyAHA: Lifesaving Info Not Always a 911 Call AwayMany, But Not All, Hospitals Require Flu Shots for StaffersCancer Care Twice as Costly in U.S. Versus CanadaAHA: Health Concerns Haunt Puerto Rico as New Hurricane Season BeginsPot, Opioids Now Rival Alcohol as Factor in Driver DeathsThe ER or Urgent Care?Trumps Signs Bill Allowing Terminal Patients to Try Unproven MedicinesTough State Drunk Driving Laws Save LivesE-Cigarettes Don't Help Smokers Quit, But Cash MightSmall World? Not With One-Quarter Obese by 2045A Pill to Protect You From the Sun? Don't Believe It, FDA SaysMost Hospitals Aren't Ready for Mass Tragedies, ER Docs SayAHA: Making America's Doctors Look More Like AmericaLanguage Used in Medical Record Can Affect Patient CareNonprofit Manufacturer Could Keep Generic Drug Costs DownOpioid Makers' Perks to Docs Tied to More PrescriptionsFDA Targets Clinics Offering Unapproved Stem Cell TherapiesLittle 'Quit-Smoking' Help at U.S. Mental Health CentersIs Testing for Zika in U.S. Blood Supply Worth the Cost?'Smoke-Free' Rooms Still Loaded With Smoke Residues, Study FindsAHA: Smoke-Free Laws Do Seem to Help Young Adults' HeartsAHA: Poverty Levels Key to States' Performance on Heart DiseaseSimple Drug Packaging Change Could Save Toddlers' LivesFDA Cracks Down on Dangerous E-Cig Liquids That Resemble Cookies, CandyNew Clinic Satisfaction Tool Provides Real-Time FeedbackUnused Meds? Saturday Is National Drug Take Back DayA Doctor's Age May Matter With Emergency SurgeryPatients Prefer Doctors Who Engage in Face-to-Face VisitsU.S. Better Able to Tackle Health Emergencies: ReportFirst Opioid Lawsuit Targeting Pharmacy Benefit ManagersMost Doctors' Offices Don't Offer Flexibility for UninsuredSafety Info for Opioids Found LackingNonoptimized Drug Therapy Costs More Than $500 Billion AnnuallyFDA Cracks Down on Caffeine-Loaded SupplementsCigarette Tax Hike Could Ease Poverty for Millions Worldwide: StudyCDC: Aggressive Action Needed to Contain Antibiotic ResistanceCould Medical Pot Help Curb the Opioid Abuse Crisis?Medical E-Records Not Without Risks: StudyHealth Groups Sue FDA to Speed Review of E-CigarettesEHR Usability Contributes to Possible Patient Harm EventsAHA: Solving the Dilemma of Not Enough HeartsUnchecked Air Pollution a Death Sentence for Millions: StudyPersonal Health Info Found in Recycling at Five HospitalsTask Force Issues Stronger Skin Cancer Prevention GuidelinesFDA Considers Lowering Nicotine Levels in Cigarettes
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Knowing Too Much About Your Genes Might Be Risky

HealthDay News
by -- Robert Preidt
Updated: Nov 13th 2017

new article illustration

MONDAY, Nov. 13, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- There's such a thing as too much information when it comes to learning about your genes, two new studies suggest.

In one study, participants thought they were learning about their genetic risk for depression, not knowing that the test results they were given had been made up at random.

The study participants who were told they had a higher genetic risk for depression recalled having experienced more symptoms of depression than did those who were told they did not have an increased genetic risk.

"These results suggest that merely being told they have a genetic propensity toward depression might actually distort people's memories about how much depression they've experienced in the past," the study's lead author, Matthew Lebowitz, said in a Yale University news release.

The study's co-author, Woo-kyoung Ahn, a psychology professor at Yale, added that "this is particularly alarming when we consider that patients' memories about their own subjective experiences are the primary information used to make a psychiatric diagnosis."

The findings were published in the November issue of the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

In a second study by the same research team, participants who were told they did not have a genetic risk for obesity rated diet and exercise as less important, and were much more likely to eat unhealthy foods than were participants who were not given this information.

The study, available online, will be published in January 2018 in the journal Appetite.

"It seems that when people were told they did not have a particular genetic susceptibility to obesity, they assumed that they wouldn't have to worry about what they ate or how much exercise they got," Ahn said.

This "genetic invincibility effect" can give people a false sense of invulnerability, according to the researchers.

Lebowitz said, "Providing people with information about their own genes is likely to become an increasingly common practice in many areas of health care, and this will probably have a lot of benefits."

But, he added, "while the advantages of increased access to genetic information seem to be widely recognized, our findings suggest that there might also be some downsides that the field needs to grapple with."

More information

The U.S. National Institute of General Medical Sciences has more on genetics.