Call 413.540.1234 to
schedule an appointment
CONCERN/EAP: 413.534.2625
Billing questions? Call: 413.540.1212
CRISIS: 413.733.6661

Health Policy & Advocacy
Resources
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
Patients Prefer Doctors Who Engage in Face-to-Face VisitsU.S. Better Able to Tackle Health Emergencies: ReportFirst Opioid Lawsuit Targeting Pharmacy Benefit ManagersMost Doctors' Offices Don't Offer Flexibility for UninsuredSafety Info for Opioids Found LackingNonoptimized Drug Therapy Costs More Than $500 Billion AnnuallyFDA Cracks Down on Caffeine-Loaded SupplementsCigarette Tax Hike Could Ease Poverty for Millions Worldwide: StudyCDC: Aggressive Action Needed to Contain Antibiotic ResistanceCould Medical Pot Help Curb the Opioid Abuse Crisis?Medical E-Records Not Without Risks: StudyHealth Groups Sue FDA to Speed Review of E-CigarettesEHR Usability Contributes to Possible Patient Harm EventsAHA: Solving the Dilemma of Not Enough HeartsUnchecked Air Pollution a Death Sentence for Millions: StudyPersonal Health Info Found in Recycling at Five HospitalsTask Force Issues Stronger Skin Cancer Prevention GuidelinesFDA Considers Lowering Nicotine Levels in CigarettesDoctors Facing Challenge to Help Needy While Protecting PracticesPharmacists Encouraged to Learn More About Herbal SupplementsBan Menthols to Help Some Smokers QuitStem Cell Clinics Pitch Pricey, Bogus 'Cures' for Knee PainMany Americans Think Docs Order Too Many Tests, MedsIs Herbal Drug Kratom a Health Friend or Foe?Early Studies Often Show Exaggerated Treatment EffectStrong Tobacco Laws May Weed Out Vapers, TooUnderstanding Rx Nonadherence Can Improve AdherenceBystander Use of Defib Device Doubles Chances of Surviving Cardiac ArrestNew Research Debunks Two Medical Marijuana MythsTake Early Clinical Trials With a Grain of SaltCould Hackers Target Heart Devices?Protecting Your Electronic Health RecordsAfter Another Shooting Tragedy, 'Stop the Bleed' Kits Urged for SchoolsPatients Want Physicians to Have Greater ConnectivityYour Tax Dollars Fund Research on Hundreds of New MedsFour Best Practices Outlined to Prevent Health Care CyberattacksMany Patients Know Too Little About Their MRI, CT Scans: StudyUnsafe Water Found in Faucets Across the U.S.Health Tip: Prevent Exposure to LeadHealth Tip: Online Pharmacies You Should AvoidDon't Count on an American to Do CPRPoll: Personal Beliefs Shouldn't Allow Doctors to Refuse to TreatFDA Says U.S. Will Now Produce Critical MRI ComponentPicking a New Primary Care DoctorUber, Lyft Rides May Not Help Boost Doc Visits for Poorer Patients2018 Immunization Schedule Issued for U.S. ChildrenA Hidden Source of 'Superbugs' in Hospitals?2018 Immunization Schedule Issued for U.S. AdultsTop Three Challenges Identified for Pharmacists in 2018Responding to Opioid Crisis, FDA Puts More Restrictions on Imodium
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

EHR Usability Contributes to Possible Patient Harm Events


HealthDay News
Updated: Mar 27th 2018

new article illustration

TUESDAY, March 27, 2018 (HealthDay News) -- Electronic health record (EHR) usability may contribute to possible patient harm events, according to a research letter published in the March 27 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Jessica L. Howe, from MedStar Health in Washington, D.C., and colleagues analyzed patient safety reports from 2013 to 2016 to identify those that explicitly mentioned a major EHR vendor or product. Two usability experts reviewed reports to assess whether the report contained explicit language to associate the harm report with an EHR usability issue.

The researchers found that 0.11 percent of 1.735 million reported safety events explicitly mentioned an EHR vendor or product and were reported as possible patient harm. Overall, 557 reports (0.03 percent) had language that explicitly indicated that EHR usability contributed to possible patient harm. Of the 557 reports, harm level analysis showed that the patient was reached and potentially required monitoring to preclude harm, potentially caused temporary harm, potentially caused permanent harm, and could have necessitated intervention to sustain life or could have resulted in death (84, 14, 1, and <1 percent, respectively). Usability challenges occurred during order placement, medication administration, review of results, and documentation (38, 37, 16, and 9 percent, respectively).

"Only a small percentage of potential harm events were associated with EHR usability but the analysis was conservative because safety reports only capture a small fraction of the actual number of safety incidents," the authors write.

Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)